To get right to it: On August 12, I got thrown off my bike on Martha's
Vineyard and broke my left shoulder, specifically, my left humeral
bone.
We were headed back to our rental house in the late afternoon after a
ride out to Morning Glory Farm for some sweet corn and baked goods. MV
has a great network of bike paths, and we were riding through the
State Forest. Leslie recently got a new bike, and so she was up ahead
a bit seeing what it could do, while Daniel and I were moving along a
bit more slowly behind her. We had ridden about 16 miles total at this
point, and he was beginning to tire. I was hanging back with him,
encouraging him to keep up and telling him that we didn't have too much
longer to go. We were probably about 4-5 miles from the house at this
point. I was looking forward to getting back to the house, taking a
long outdoor shower, and then drinking a beer in the hammock before we
went to dinner.
While I was thinking about this I had dropped back behind him a few
yards, and he slowed a bit. I think we were moving about 10mph or so
at the time. As he did, his back wheel brushed my front. I tried to
slow further and asked him to pick it up a bit. At the same time, I
started getting worried that he was going to go down, so I turned to
the left to get clear of his wheel. As I did so his bumped mine, and I
was thrown from the bike.
I tried to roll as I fell, and I landed right on top of my left
shoulder. When I hit, I felt a distinct "pop" in my shoulder and
immediately knew I was in trouble. I skidded about another 5 ft on the
tarmac, getting some pretty bad elbow road rash, and finally came to a
stop.
Fortunately, Daniel had not fallen and was unaware that I had, so both
he and Leslie were about 200 yards down the path. I could see some
pretty nasty rash on the side of my knee, so I tried to sit up to get
a better look at it. However there was intense pain every time I
attempted to move my left arm. I yelled to Leslie and Daniel to come
back and that I thought I had broken my arm.
As it eventually turned out, I had broken my shoulder and fortunately,
there was only a small displacement. The impact had actually impaled the "stick" of the bone on the spongy "ball," stabilizing it and
making what I was later told would have been difficult, painful surgery unnecessary.
What was less fortunate was that this happened on the second day of
our annual 2 week vacation on the Vineyard. The doctor who treated me
in the ER was certain that the local orthopedist was going to send me
back to NY post haste to get some pins put in. Fortunately, the
orthopedist told me that it looked like I'd lucked out and wouldn't
need surgery; he also recommended that I stay around another week so
that he could take a look at it again. As it was, we did end up going
home about half a week early.
I'm in the fourth week or so of physical therapy now, which is going
well, though quite painful. I have not really slept well since the
accident. Most nights I wake at about 3am or so, trying to find a
relatively comfortable position for my arm. This happens consistently
despite the wide range of various pharmaceuticals I have been
prescribed. My physical therapist told me this week that shoulder
injuries are some of the most painful and difficult to recover from,
and that I'm probably in for another month or so of pain and
discomfort before I really start to feel better. If I can get through
that time without completely collapsing of exhaustion, I'll be a very
happy man.
UPDATE: I wanted to mention one other thing. The EMTs on Martha's Vineyard were extraordinarily nice and helpful. They got the ambulance onto a bikepath in the middle of the forest. They kept me reasonably calm and very well-informed during the entire time on the bikepath, which was remarkable since they decided to collar me and strap me to the board for safety's sake. Everyone was extremely professional and a credit to their professions.
Technorati Tags:
bicycling, cycling, mv, injuries, vacation
Update: Karel! I deleted the wrong one! My joke won't work now! Crap. Comment again or something.]]>
Joi Ito has been at the center of critical movements to make technology, and creative freedom, available widely. He loves his profession, and he does it well. Mornings for him do not begin with the regret of who he couldn't be. But his success in these fields has also given him an understanding of the people in these fields. In the twenty-some years of his work, he has come to know the people of these industries (both commercial and non-profit) well. They are his friends (Ito has no enemies). He engages them as a friend, always concerned and giving, never short or impatient. He understands them by learning to see them in a certain way. He engages them with the love of friendship by learning to see them in the most beautiful, or distinctive way, possible. Digital technologies have now given us a way to see just how Joi sees the world. By lowering the cost of access and practice, the technologies have allowed Ito to become an accomplished amateur photographer. But 'accomplished' in this context means that he has learned how to capture the person he sees. And unlike the professional photographer, who ordinarily has 10 minutes to come to 'know' the person he photographs, Ito has had his whole professional career. He knows the people in this book. He has come to see them in their most beautiful, or extraordinary light, and he has perfected an ability to capture what he sees, and share it with all of us.Jesus, what is this? Messianic 2.0? And this saccharine hagiography is from the introduction to a "limited edition" (I can just imagine the price) collection of "portraits." Note the usual technology has disintermediated photography bilge. The ironic thing: Joi Ito is rich. He could already easily afford both access and practice, I'm sure. But we get sold this usual crap about taking photography away from some vague "priesthood", and Joichi Ito gets to scrapbook on a global scale. What a racket. You unwashed not getting comped a copy can download the CC-licensed flickr images, though I'm unsure why you'd want to since it's the usual conference-roaming gang of technology "creatives." For the most part I've given up on shoveling shit against the tide of these people, but this one was just too much to let go by.
Technorati Tags: photography, cc, a-list, usual gang of idiots
]]>"And then I am permitted only 250 words to tell them about how I used to love Taco Bell but how I’m not feeling well now after having two bites of frijoles that were soupy and strange and how I had to go back to the counter twice to get them to remake a simple grilled burrito that was falling apart and disgusting and how the employee clearly didn’t give a shit and that was why I decided I really didn’t want him feeding me today so I demanded a refund and probably won’t go back to Taco Bell for a decade or two."
One sometimes wonders whether the real allure of the Internet for people like Mr "In This Our New World" Jarvis is in its excellence as an amplifier making it possible for him to scream "This is an OUTRAGE" at the top of his virtual lungs on BOTH a hyperlocal and global basis. The man has a slight detector set to 12. He gets one bad burrito in a Taco Bell and it warrants this big of a "I am SO blogging this" snit? If he acts anything in Real Life like he does on the web, I'm astonished you can get anyone to wait on him at all. One would advise another glass of citizen sommelier-sourced Merlot to wash down a nice, horse-sized chillpill with your next Stufft [sic] Whatever.
As my sainted Mither used to say "Do you really need to make a Federal case out of this?"
PS: JJ, if I were you I'd start checking my entrees for evidence of recent expectoration.
]]>Technorati Tags: vegan, vegetarian, happy+meat, compassionate+carnivore, ethical+meat
]]>"Unwatchable," as in don't show me where the candied bacon ice cream comes from.Downergate was a box-office hit: Animal-rights activists have discovered that downloadable video can be the most potent weapon in their arsenal, as long as their footage doesn’t contain so much violence as to render it unwatchable. Apparently we empathize more with large mammals, too. (New York Times)
(Via The Ethicurean.)
Technorati Tags: vegan, vegetarian, locawhores
]]>In their view [Pollan's] got a bully pulpit and should be using it to rally a mass movement against Big Food, instead of encouraging people to believe that having an organic soyburger for lunch puts them in the front ranks of political activism.If only it were an organic soyburger instead of a "grass-fed" dead animal. I pretty much agree with this otherwise - most of the locawhatever movement is pretty much "better living through shopping" - but given Dilemma's sloppily thought-out dismissal of vegetarianism, this sentence is no more than an attempt at tarring with the "dirty hippie" brush.
Technorati Tags: sole food, vegan, vegetarian
]]>Sticks and stones and spin: Stop talking about “debeaking” a chicken — that bothers people. Instead, let’s call it “beak conditioning”! (NWAnews.com)Pot? Farmer Kettle from Hypocrite Gulch Farms on line 2. Says he wants to sell you some local grass-fed black.
Technorati Tags: food, locavores, slow food, sole food, vegan, vegetarian
]]>Technorati Tags: blogwhores, bubble2.0, bullshit, vrm, vroom vroom
]]>Technorati Tags: blogging, blogwhores, clickophant, linkwhores, webble2.0, webwhores
]]>Surprising omission he didn't notice: Python.
Technorati Tags: blogging, blogwhores, clickophant, linkwhores, web2.0, webble2.0, webwhores, whoretrain
]]>For Andrew and about a dozen people in our circle who have recently converted from vegetarianism, eating sustainable meat purchased from small farmers is a new form of activism—a way of striking a blow against the factory farming of livestock that books like Michael Pollan's The Omnivore's Dilemma describe so damningly. Pollan extols the virtues of independent, small-scale food producers who raise pasture-fed livestock in a sustainable and ethical manner. In contrast, he provides a compelling critique of factory farms, which cram thousands of cows, pigs or chickens into rows of cages in warehouses, feed them drugs to plump up their meat and fight off the illnesses caused by these inhumane conditions, and produce innumerable tons of environmentally destructive animal waste.Meat eaters have had it bad for a long time. In the face of growing evidence that it was right up there with cigarette smoking as a pretty unjustifiable habit in almost every aspect, it was increasingly difficult to find anything beyond "But it TASTES good" as a rationale for eating meat. But then St Pollan came along and changed all that. All of a sudden it was possible for a little bit of that PeTA frisson to rub off on meat eaters. All of a sudden you're not a death-enabling environmental disaster wrapped up in a heart attack waiting to happen anymore, you're an...ACTIVIST!The terms "grass fed" and "pasture raised"—meaning that an animal was allowed to graze the old-fashioned way instead of being fed an unnatural and difficult-to-digest diet of mostly corn and other grain—have now entered the food-shoppers' lexicon. But Andrew and I didn't fully understand what those phrases meant until we got to know Greg Nauta of Rocky Canyon Farms. Nauta is a small-scale rancher and farmer from Atascadero, California, who grows organic vegetables and raises about 35 animals on pastureland. Since we met him at the Hollywood Farmers' Market a year ago, it has become even clearer to us that supporting guys like him—by seeking out and paying a premium for sustainably raised meat—is the right thing for us to do.
And how are you an activist? By supporting boutique meat farmers. And in this lies the first and perhaps most insidious reasoning behind humane meat. Apparently, the only thing that has really kept vegetarians from eating meat is factory farming and the horrible conditions therein. Small meat farmers like Mr Nauta, who raise their animals "humanely," have effectively removed the moral argument for vegetarianism.
Well, except for that part where he kills them. I have seen slaughter euphemistically referred to elsewhere as one "really bad day." It's a ridiculous argument. I know few vegetarians whose objection to meat-eating ignores the slaughter (oh sorry, Queenie, "harvest") of the animal. Most vegetarians want factory farming AND animal slaughter stopped. It's not like "humane" practices are a sufficient improvement in animal treatment to nullify the moral objection to meat eating. I don't want to put dead animals in my body. Period. (And parenthetically, even with boutique meat farmers, I don't know that basing a food movement on a bunch of foodies in California is scalable to even the rest of the country, let alone the world.)
Next we get the "soy is actually poison" - what I've come to think of as the "grass-fed exemption:"
If preserving small-scale farming isn't a compelling enough reason to eat beef or pork, consider the nutritional advantages grass-fed meat has over the factory-fed kind. "One of the benefits of all-grass-fed beef, or 'beef with benefits,' as we say, is that it's lower in fat than conventionally raised beef," says Kate Clancy, who studies nutrition and sustainable agriculture and was until recently the senior scientist at the nonprofit Union of Concerned Scientists. "The other thing is that the meat and milk from grass-fed cattle will probably have higher amounts of omega-3 fatty acids, which may help reduce the risk of heart disease and strengthen people's immune systems. What's good for the environment, what's good for cattle, is also good for us."Combine these findings with the questions being raised about meat replacements derived from soy and wheat gluten, and the real thing seems better by the minute. "What we know about soy is that as you process it, you lose a lot of the benefits," says Ashley Koff, a Los Angeles–based registered dietician. "Any soy-based fake meat product is incredibly processed, and you have to use chemicals to get the mock flavor. Any other whole-food diet is going to be a lot better for you." Vegetarians like Andrew—he once brought a tofu sandwich to a famous Texas barbecue restaurant—may now have a harder time justifying their "healthier" dietary choices.
Next, we get the "Boca Burger" argument: carnivores may be healthier than vegetarians who eat a lot of highly processed meat analogues. We get the usual handwaving about soy here, though this article is a first in trying to rope in seitan as well. We then get a nutritionist who states the obvious - that heavily processed foods are not that great. Thus vegetarians, who really eat nothing but soy-based versions of meat, would be better off eating actual meat, which are assumed to better for you than soy analogues, because meat has somehow now become a "whole food." Note also how in that last sentence, tofu gets subtly included in the meat analog category via the cutesy anecdote. This is just silly.
The argument is further bolstered by anecdotes from noted former vegetarians Mollie Katzen, who wee've covered before, and - Mariel Hemingway, whose main reason for eating meat again is that makes her feel "more grounded." Hell, if Mariel's given it up, I am SO over it. Again, talk to me when Laurel Robertson starts calling meat a "whole food."
Having knocked down the reasons for vegetarianism one by one, the author moves in for the kill (so to speak):
or Andrew and many of our ex-vegetarian friends, the ethical reasons for eating meat, combined with the health-related ones, have been impossible to deny. "The way I see it, you've got three opportunities every day to act on your values and have an immediate effect on something you're concerned about," Andrew says. "You're probably worried about Darfur, too, but what can you do about that every single day? Write a letter? It doesn't have the same kind of impact."
Ah, but then finally we arrive at the rub:
Supporting ranchers we believe in, and the stores and restaurants that sell their products, has a very tangible impact that we experience firsthand all the time. But ask most vegetarians if the battle between small, sustainable ranchers and industrial farming is at the top of their list of concerns about eating meat, and you'll probably be met with a blank stare. "For people who are against eating meat because it's wrong or offensive to eat animals, even the cleanest grass-fed beef won't be good enough," Katzen says.Convincing those people that eating meat can improve the welfare of the entire livestock population is a tough sell. But we'll keep trying.
You really have to slip this in at the end of the article, because otherwise you look like an utter fool. And really that's the answer to the question in the article's title. People who were never really all that vegetarian to begin with are eating meat, because "ethical meat" is the latest flower the foodies have flitted upon. The rest of us, who really are eating a whole food diet - based on plants - who are aware of the nutritional, environmental, and moral advantages of doing so, aren't fooled by the attempt to put a kindly face on the horror of slaughter. Keep trying. You'll keep failing.
Technorati Tags: ethical meat, food, foodies, humane meat, localvore, vegan, vegetarian
]]>I hope Brent Simmons got a lot of money for selling NetNewsWire to NewsGator, because he's thrown the software's reputation to the wind.
I mostly read news on 2 machines, a Powerbook and a dual G5 at work. Sometimes I also use the iMac we have upstairs in the study. Sometimes I'm on a machine I don't own with a web browser. What I want is the ability to read a feed item on one machine and have the other machines know that I've read it and not show it to me again as new.
If I subscribe to a feed on one machine, I want the others to know that and show me that feed when I read feeds on another machine.
In short, what I need is reliable synchronization across machines.
I don't think these are particularly unique needs. But NetNewsWire can't handle this scenario.
In the days when I ran emacs over a terminal connection to panix.com and read Usenet in gnus, this was easy. Whenever I quit, my .newsrc got updated with my read/unread counts, and that was that. It worked.
NetNewsWire once worked pretty well in terms of synchronization. I could synchronize my Bloglines subscriptions with it, and life was good.
Then NNW got sold to NewsGator, and I was magnaminously offered a free 2 year subscription to NewsGator online. Not only that, but they ALSO had an online newsreader, so I could still read either on my Powerbook, my work machine, or a web browser, if I happened to be away from my own machines.
So I switched over to NewsGator syncing.
It has been an utter disaster ever since. NewsGator's web based reader is an horribly broken shitty piece of crap. I have just spent the last hour making multiple attempts at deleting a folder in my feeds list. I right-click the folder. I select "Delete folder." The folder disappears. I wait a few minutes to see if the change "took." I refresh the browser. The folder reappears.
I delete it again. I wait. I quit the browser. I restart the browser and go to the NewsGator reader. The folder is there again. I repeat the process. I quit that browser and open a different one. The folder is still there.
I decide to attack it from the NNW end. I open NNW and tell it to overwrite NewsGator. It merges the list with the online list. There's the folder still.
During my many replacement attempts, NNW/NewsGator appears to do things in an entirely arbitrary manner, randomly deleting feeds and setting read/unread counts on my feeds.
I do not appear to be alone. A search for "sync" on NewsGator's NNW support forum yields 178 topics. And from what I can see there, the support staff has no idea what's going on either. The typical entry has a user complaning about the same sorts of things I am - basically, that the syncing is just plain broken. In one hapless schmuck's case, after trying every last "fix" in the book, we get this total left-field Hail Mary play from the support guy:
This is just getting weird! Is there any chance that someone else could have your username/password and be using the account at another lcoation? We've seen this happen when people sell computers etc and leave the software on it.Even if you don't think that is the case, can you try changing your password in NewsGator Online, and also NNW and see if that helps at all.
Of course, in the next reply, the poor user says that that didn't work either, and then all is silence. This is the worst kind of "support" - the kind where it's everything and anything's fault except the software's. Among the excuses trotted out in the support forum is to check with your IT administrator to see if SOAP headers aren't getting through your firewall, that people are closing the application before it has a chance to complete the sync, and that perennial favorite - you're not using a current enough beta.
Google Reader may not be a river of news, take full advantage of Mac OS X services, or be up to Gruber-caliber HIG snuff, but it has one distinct and overriding advantage:
It works as advertised.
Technorati Tags: apple, geek, mac, netnewswire, newsgator, nnw, os x, rss, web2.0
]]>